A 13-year-old boy has filed a lawsuit against his UK parents for “brutally” deporting him to Africa and enrolling him in a boarding school.
The boy, whose identity remains protected, contacted the British Consulate and a child welfare organization after his parents took him from the UK to Africa, registered him in a school there, and returned to the UK without him.
His legal team claimed the parents “physically and emotionally abandoned” him due to fears about his potential involvement in London gangs, an accusation the boy strongly denies.
During a hearing on Tuesday, Nov. 26, the boy’s lawyers urged a judge to order his return to the UK, where he has lived since birth.
However, lawyers for the boy’s father argued that sending him to Africa was a valid exercise of parental responsibility.
The boy’s lawyer, Fottrell, emphasized that he “categorically” denied any gang involvement and argued that the risks his parents feared would not materialize if he returned to the UK. She described him as “very polite and articulate,” with interests in football and cooking.
Fottrell explained that the boy was enrolled in the school abroad without his prior knowledge, under the pretext of visiting an ill relative. Upon arrival, his parents abandoned him there.
She called the parents’ actions “stark and quite brutal,” referencing the boy’s complaints of “inadequate” food and education, mistreatment, and feelings of humiliation. The boy reported being mocked by his English friends for the situation and said he was “patently extremely unhappy” in Africa.
Additionally, Fottrell mentioned that the boy’s mother admitted to physically chastising him while in the UK. He was described as “upset, confused, and distressed,” though he acknowledged he wasn’t perfect.
During the hearing, Judge Mr. Justice Hayden noted that the boy had endured “incredibly restrictive” measures in the UK, including phone-based location monitoring, which he suggested would be “pretty unbearable for most 14-year-old boys and girls.”
Rebecca Foulkes, representing the boy’s father, said social workers had documented behavioral issues before his relocation to Africa.
Reports highlighted instances of the boy being physically aggressive toward his mother when she attempted to manage his behavior.
Foulkes added that the boy was often late to class, stayed out late, and was suspected of engaging in criminal activities.
The school expressed concerns over his social vulnerability and observed him wearing expensive clothes and using high-end phones, with images of knives and friends holding knives found on his device.
Foulkes argued that the father perceived a clear decline in the boy’s behavior, pointing to signs of criminal activity.
She stated that the parents had “real concerns about where he was and who he was with.”
Foulkes further contended that “high-quality care and education in a boundary setting” were available in Africa, where the dangers he faced in the UK were absent. She argued that returning to the UK would waste his potential.
The court also heard arguments supporting the parents’ decision as being in the boy’s best interest, even if it conflicted with his preferences.
The hearing before Mr. Justice Hayden will continue at a later date.
