A fierce debate has erupted in South-West Nigeria over the establishment of Sharia panels, with supporters and critics locked in a war of words. Muslim leaders in the region assert their constitutional rights to establish arbitration panels for resolving civil matters, while opponents argue that such moves could undermine societal cohesion and the existing legal framework.
The controversy began in Oyo town, Oyo State, where the Supreme Council for Sharia in Nigeria (SCSN) planned to inaugurate a Sharia panel. The event, slated for January 11, 2024, was indefinitely postponed following public outcry.
In a statement, Imam Daud Igi Ogun, the Khadimul Muslimeen of Oyo Kingdom, said, “The inauguration ceremony has been suspended until further notice. Islam portrays peace.”
The proposed panel, set to operate from the Muslim Community Islamic Centre in Oyo, drew the ire of non-Muslim groups, particularly the Yoruba Council Worldwide (Igbimo Apapo Yoruba Lagbaye), which threatened legal action against its promoters.
Sharia Panels vs. Courts
The distinction between Sharia panels and courts lies at the heart of the debate. Muslim leaders, including the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), emphasized that Sharia panels are voluntary arbitration bodies, not judicial courts.
“Sharia panels have existed in the South-West for decades,” said MURIC Director, Prof. Ishaq Akintola. “These panels handle civil matters like marriage, divorce, and inheritance among Muslims and have no power of enforcement. They operate in mosques and are entirely voluntary.”
Prof. Akintola further accused critics of stirring unnecessary tension. “How logical is it to oppose Muslims forming committees or arbitration panels within their community? This isn’t new; Sharia panels exist in Lagos, Ogun, Osun, and other South-West states,” he said.
Historical Context
Proponents argue that Sharia has historical roots in Yorubaland, citing examples of Sharia courts established by Muslim monarchs in the 19th and early 20th centuries. However, critics contend that such practices faded due to colonial reforms and the dominance of the secular legal system.
MURIC also pointed to constitutional provisions allowing the practice of Sharia law in states with significant Muslim populations, but noted that no South-West state government has officially endorsed Sharia courts.
Government’s Stance
Reacting to the controversy, Governor Seyi Makinde of Oyo State reaffirmed his administration’s commitment to the rule of law.
“Oyo State will not permit any illegality,” said Makinde’s Chief Press Secretary, Dr. Sulaimon Olanrewaju. “If their actions align with the law, fine. If not, the law must be upheld.”
Diverse Opinions
The debate has exposed a divide in public opinion. Supporters view Sharia panels as an essential component of Muslim life, asserting their right to live by Islamic principles. Critics fear the panels could sow division and challenge the secular nature of the South-West’s legal framework.
A Sharia judge, Mr. Trimizee Adisa Dairo, highlighted the significance of Sharia to Muslims. “Sharia governs every aspect of a Muslim’s life—social, economic, and private. Denying this is akin to denying their faith,” he said.
What’s Next?
While the inauguration of the Oyo Sharia panel has been postponed, the debate is far from over. Supporters remain resolute, citing constitutional rights, while opponents prepare for legal battles to halt the initiative.
As the region grapples with these contentious issues, the outcome could set a precedent for balancing religious freedom with societal cohesion in Nigeria’s diverse communities.
About The Author
