A coalition of professors and legal professionals operating under the banner Justice4AfeBabalolaLegacy (JABL) has stepped forward to defend the reputation and legacy of Afe Babalola, a 96-year-old legal icon widely regarded for his contributions to the legal profession in Nigeria. The group expressed strong disapproval of alleged defamatory claims made against Babalola, emphasizing that his legacy must be preserved against baseless allegations.
In a press briefing held in Ibadan, the group, which includes Professors Adeyemi Ademowo, Ademola Azeez, Ayodeji Emmanuel, as well as prominent lawyers Femi Alufa and Rotimi Opeyeoluwa, emphasized their commitment to ensuring that justice is served in the ongoing legal case between Afe Babalola and Mr. Dele Farotimi. The matter revolves around alleged defamatory content in a book authored by Farotimi, which has sparked widespread debate about defamation and its legal treatment.
“A Legacy Built on Hard Work and Excellence”
The members of JABL passionately highlighted Babalola’s lifelong dedication to the legal profession, which has seen him become one of the most revered figures in Nigeria’s judicial system. “At 96, Afe Babalola’s achievements are a testament to decades of relentless hard work, discipline, and commitment to the rule of law,” they noted.
The group pointed out that Babalola has mentored an unparalleled number of legal professionals, including Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs), and has played a critical role in shaping Nigeria’s legal landscape. “He has given more to the legal profession than many can imagine, and we cannot sit by and watch his legacy tarnished by unsubstantiated allegations,” said Convener and Publicity Secretary Messrs. Alufa and Opeyeoluwa.
Disputed Book Banned from Circulation
The controversy stems from a book authored by Farotimi, which allegedly contains defamatory statements about Babalola. The court has since banned the sale and citation of the book. JABL emphasized that referencing the book would be a criminal act, given the court’s ruling. “No credible professional would rely on a publication that lacks factual foundation and has been deemed unfit for circulation by a court of law,” the group asserted.
The members further noted the growing trend of baseless criticisms directed at successful individuals in Nigeria. They described such actions as stemming from envy and called for a change in societal attitudes.
Libel: Civil or Criminal?
One of the key points of contention in the case has been the classification of libel as a criminal matter. Critics argue that libel should solely be treated as a civil matter, but JABL strongly disagreed, citing legal provisions in Nigeria that allow for both civil and criminal proceedings in defamation cases.
“In some states, including Edo and Abuja, libel is treated as a civil matter. However, in other jurisdictions, such as this case, it can be criminal. It is within Chief Afe Babalola’s rights to pursue criminal defamation if he chooses. No one can dictate how he seeks remedy under the law,” the group stated emphatically.
They further criticized what they referred to as “emergency lawyers” who, according to them, lack a proper understanding of legal principles and rely on misconceptions to argue their points. “Some so-called human rights activists use their platforms to spread misinformation, but true activism does not come at the expense of another person’s rights or reputation,” they added.
The Importance of Fair Justice
JABL made a fervent call for balanced justice, emphasizing that both parties deserve to have their cases fairly evaluated. “Justice must be served for Chief Afe Babalola and Mr. Dele Farotimi. However, it must be rooted in truth and adherence to the law,” they said.
The group expressed their willingness to go the extra mile to defend Babalola’s legacy, including conducting nationwide campaigns to correct any misconceptions about him. “If we have the resources, we will ensure that people across the country understand the truth about Chief Afe Babalola and the immense contributions he has made,” they concluded.
A Call for Responsibility in Activism
The group also criticized the misuse of human rights activism to defame individuals. “Being a human rights activist does not grant anyone a license to spread falsehoods. True advocacy respects the rights and dignity of others while championing justice,” they said.
Conclusion
As the case unfolds, the group remains firm in its stance to uphold the integrity of Afe Babalola’s name and legacy. They urge the public to exercise caution in forming opinions based on unverified claims and to respect the judicial process.
For more updates and in-depth analysis of this developing story, stay connected to Hobnob News.
About The Author
