In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court has upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal, affirming that the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, should be treated on par with other states. The presiding justice, John Okoro, posed a critical question during the proceedings, asking whether a candidate who secures votes in 30 states but not in Abuja should be disqualified from presidency, highlighting the need for clarity in interpreting the law.
Justice Okoro, while delivering the lead judgment, emphasized that the failure of the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) Integrated Results Viewing System (IReV) should not impede the collation of election results. He noted that although the non-functioning of IReV may prevent people from viewing the results, it should not be grounds for nullifying the election or eroding electoral trust.
Furthermore, Justice Okoro emphasized that the failure of IReV did not impact the overall outcome of the election. Consequently, the Supreme Court ruled against the appellants, resolving the issue in favor of the respondents.
This decision by the Supreme Court solidifies the position of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, as an equivalent entity to other states, ensuring equal treatment and fair representation in the electoral process.
