The controversy over the alleged imprint of the Tinubu Presidential Legal Team, TPLT on the Certified True Copy, CTC of the judgment of the Presidential Election Petition Court, PEPC got messier on Sunday after the Labour Party rejected the explanation given by the TPLT on the imprint being a watermark.
Even more, Labour Party in its reaction expressed concern that the Tinubu Team which was not pressed for time on making an appeal got the CTC well ahead of the other parties that were pressed for time to file an appeal.
Obiorah Ifoh, director of publicity of the Labour Party in a statement made available to Hobnob News said the PEPC and the APC owed the nation an explanation over the CTC controversy saying that an unsigned statement issued by a member of the TPLT was not satisfactory.
The statement read thus:
“Consequent upon the revelation that Certified True Copies (CTC) of the recent judgment by the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) had an imprint, “Tinubu Presidential Legal Team” (TPLT) as its header, Nigerians are curious about such happenstance that has inevitably generated storm and controversy.
The Labour Party was very disturbed by the delay in releasing the judgment expeditiously, only to be confronted with this befuddlement. The public is equally at pains trying to comprehend what is happening.
According to the party, “The onus of explaining and dousing the unfolding controversy rests on the PEPC and the TPLT, the imprint owners. Clearly, the header is not a watermark. We note that only some of the petitioners received the same version. “In a highly contentious case with dire national interest and implications, confirming that the PEPC did not confer any advantage, rights, or privileges to any party is imperative. This development must be cleared up quickly to avoid conjectures and the belief that something untoward happened. This cannot be the case of another glitch.
The party noted that “the unsigned and undated statement issued purportedly by a senior counsel on behalf of the Tinubu Legal Team is misconceived and empty. The senior counsel claimed that the header is a watermark! It is not and can never be.
“Typically, a watermark is a faint imprint or design made on some papers during production and which can be seen when held up to the light. It helps in checking the genuineness of the paper.
The party stated that the senior counsel is responsible for unsubstantiating his claims and should not pass the buck to innocent parties.
“We of the Labour Party place it on record that the counsel who collected the judgment on behalf of our party and our candidate did so long after a representative of Tinubu Legal Team.
Meanwhile, “we call on the PEPC and APC to come clean on the CTC imprint and disclose whose imprimatur is inscribed on the entire judgment. Nigerians deserve the right to know and are demanding urgent answers.
About the Author
